Commentary
Immigration
- Idea and Content by Sabri Bebawi. Ph.D.
- Edited by GPT
In 1980, I relocated to the United States, then under the administration of Ronald Reagan, whom I viewed as a profoundly immoral and unfeeling figure. Reagan’s callous remark, “If you are poor in America, there must be something wrong with you,” was both amusing and disheartening. His actions further illustrated his lack of empathy; his administration’s involvement in the Iran-Contra Affair, where funds from drug sales were used to supply arms to anti-socialist forces in Guatemala, exposed a stark disregard for ethical governance.
Immigrants often navigate a progression of emotions—initial disdain, eventual acceptance, and hopefully, a genuine affection for their new home. For over forty years, I have remained in the first stage. My initial hope in seeking asylum in America, escaping the censorship and hostility I faced in the Arab world as a journalist, was met with gratitude. Yet, I soon discovered that my refuge was rife with its own forms of tyranny, pretense of democracy, and corruption.
Despite my extensive legal education, language skills, and international experience from living and working in various European countries, I struggled to feel at home in the U.S. While I engaged in academia, teaching political science and American Government, and took solace in my role as a tenured professor, my admiration for America’s system of checks and balances was often overshadowed by recurring scandals.
Regular visits to Europe, where I spent half of each year, helped maintain my sanity but came with the cost of losing my residency in several European countries where I had once lived.
“BLESSED ARE THOSE WHO KNOW THEIR LIMITATIONS.”
طوبى لمن يعرف حدوده
From several sources on the Internet. Retrieved: March 16, 2025
The adage “Blessed are those who know their limitations” underscores the wisdom in recognizing one’s boundaries to avoid perilous overreach. This principle is particularly pertinent in Middle Eastern nations confronting formidable powers like the United States and Israel. Historically, attempts by regional actors to challenge these nations have often culminated in adverse outcomes, highlighting the importance of strategic prudence.
The recent escalation in Yemen serves as a poignant illustration. The Houthi rebels, backed by Iran, have been embroiled in a protracted conflict against a coalition led by Saudi Arabia and supported by the United States. In a significant development, President Trump authorized intensified airstrikes targeting Houthi leadership and infrastructure, aiming to dismantle their operational capabilities and send a stern message to Iran regarding its regional interventions. These strikes resulted in substantial casualties, including civilian lives, and have been met with vows of retaliation from the Houthis, potentially setting the stage for further escalation.
This scenario exemplifies the severe repercussions that can ensue when regional groups challenge superior military forces without fully acknowledging the potential consequences. The United States, possessing unparalleled military capabilities, will employ decisive force to protect its interests and allies in the Middle East. Similarly, Israel, with its advanced defense systems and strategic alliances, has consistently maintained a posture of robust defense against perceived threats.
The notion that any Middle Eastern nation could feasibly defeat the United States or Israel disregards the substantial asymmetry in military power, technological advancement, and global influence. Such miscalculations have historically led to devastating outcomes, as evidenced by the prolonged conflicts in Iraq and Libya, where attempts to confront Western powers resulted in widespread instability and humanitarian crises.
Recognizing limitations is not synonymous with capitulation; instead, it reflects a strategic calculus that prioritizes sustainable development, diplomatic engagement, and regional stability over futile confrontations. Nations that have embraced this approach, opting for economic partnerships and political dialogue, have generally experienced more favorable outcomes than those that have pursued antagonistic policies.
The wisdom encapsulated in “Blessed are those who know their limitations” remains profoundly relevant. For Middle Eastern countries, acknowledging the disparity in power dynamics and choosing paths of diplomacy and cooperation over confrontation with superior forces like the United States and Israel is prudent and essential for ensuring long-term peace and prosperity in the region.
*******************************************************************************
A Tale of Two Countries
By Sabri Bebawi
THE NY TIMES-PENDING
I was born six years after the end of World War II, not in Europe or America, but in a land steeped in ancient heritage and political upheaval—the United Arab Republic, known today as Egypt. Now, decades later, I find myself living in a place that was once my dream: the United States of America. Yet, the longer I live here, the more I am haunted by a strange déjà vu. What I left behind has followed me. Or perhaps, I have come full circle.
In Egypt, I grew up under the rule of President Gamal Abdel Nasser. He was a dictator by every Western definition, ruling with an iron grip, quashing dissent, and centralizing power. And yet, he loved his country fiercely. His nationalism was not performative. Nasser sought to elevate the dignity of ordinary Egyptians, to cast off colonial influence, and to give his people a sense of ownership over their own destiny.
His methods were often harsh. He expelled thousands of foreigners and even long-term residents. But he did so without spectacle or cruelty. There were no camps. No dawn raids. No children in cages. Even when I disagreed with his actions, I never doubted his motives. Nasser ruled with a misguided but sincere sense of care for his people.
Now I live in the United States, a country I chose, and a country that once promised liberty, inclusion, and respect for all. But under the presidency of Donald Trump, I witnessed a different kind of authoritarianism—one cloaked not in purpose, but in self-interest.
President Trump also expelled immigrants. He targeted families, legal residents, asylum seekers—many of whom had lived here peacefully for years. But unlike Nasser, he did not act with the dignity of a statesman. Instead, cruelty became the point. People were arrested, humiliated, and detained without due process. Camps were built. Children were separated from their parents. Fear became a tool of governance, wielded not to protect a nation, but to please a base.
And so, I carry a heavy burden—a kind of spiritual exile. I am a naturalized citizen of the United States, but I often feel like a subject, not a participant. The ideals I once believed in—justice, compassion, the moral arc of democracy—feel fractured, if not forgotten. I find myself asking questions I never thought I’d ask: Should I stay in a country that no longer respects its own values? Or return to a homeland where religion governs law and dissent remains dangerous?
Neither option offers comfort. Egypt has become more rigid, more theocratic, less free. But America, too, feels more divided, more angry, more unsure of itself. I dream of Europe—Portugal, Spain, Greece—countries that, while imperfect, still seem to honor human dignity. But I live on a modest income. My health is failing. Emigration now feels more like fantasy than plan.
And so I remain. A witness. A participant in name. A stranger in spirit.
But I also write—because silence is not an option. I write to remind others, perhaps even remind myself, that democracy is not guaranteed. That nationalism without empathy is dangerous. That freedom erodes not only through legislation but through neglect.
I have lived under two leaders who claimed to love their nations. One governed with vision, the other with vanity. One sought unity, the other division. Neither was a true democrat, but only one left his people with a sense of dignity.
I am not naïve. I know every country struggles with its contradictions. But I also know that a nation is more than its leader. A democracy is more than its laws. And a citizen, however weary, still has a voice.
I have lived in two countries. Two systems. Two histories. I carry them both. And despite everything, I still believe there is something worth salvaging here—if only enough of us stay awake to what we are becoming.
*******************************************************************
The Failure of Multiculturalism: A Fractured Social Experiment
Edited by ChatGPT
ENGLAND HAS LOST ITS HONOR AND CHIVALRY
Multiculturalism was once hailed as a bold and progressive social experiment—a way to harmoniously blend diverse cultures, languages, and religions under a shared national identity. Proponents envisioned vibrant societies where mutual respect would lead to social enrichment, innovation, and peace. Yet, decades after multiculturalism became official policy in many Western countries, the results are sobering. Instead of producing unity through diversity, multiculturalism has led to division, cultural conflict, and weakened national identity. This article argues that multiculturalism has failed as a policy framework and a societal ideal.
Cultural Fragmentation and Parallel Societies
One of the most visible effects of multiculturalism is the emergence of ethnic and cultural enclaves that often function as parallel societies rather than integrated communities. In London, for instance, Arabs tend to cluster in Earl’s Court, Turks in Harringay, Indians in Southall, and Bangladeshis in Tower Hamlets. These areas are not merely ethnic neighborhoods—they are often self-contained worlds with distinct languages, media, schools, and religious institutions.
The result is not integration but separation. People live side by side without genuinely interacting. The “melting pot” metaphor has proven unrealistic; cultures don’t melt—they preserve themselves. Worse, they often do so while harboring suspicion or contempt for others. This fosters tribalism and erodes the shared civic identity essential for a cohesive society.
Religious Fundamentalism and the Decline of Secularism
Religion plays a significant role in deepening social divides within multicultural societies. In theory, multiculturalism embraces all faiths equally. In practice, however, some religious groups demand special privileges, while others retreat into fundamentalism. This has been particularly evident with radical Islamic movements in Europe.
In France, repeated terror attacks—such as the Charlie Hebdo shooting and the Bataclan massacre—have been carried out by second-generation immigrants born and raised in the very societies they violently reject. Similar patterns are visible in Sweden, where once-peaceful cities like Malmö have experienced spikes in gang violence and religious radicalization.
In accommodating all beliefs equally, multiculturalism fails to draw firm lines between liberal values and illiberal practices. It allows, and sometimes even funds, religious schools that promote segregation and intolerance. Secularism—the cornerstone of liberal democracy—has been weakened in an attempt to appease all groups.
Loss of National Identity and Civic Unity
When multiple cultures are placed side by side without a unifying narrative, the result is a weakened sense of national identity. People no longer see themselves as citizens with shared values, but as members of competing cultural factions. This identity crisis is evident across the West. In the United Kingdom, debates around immigration and multiculturalism fueled the Brexit movement, with many voters citing the loss of British culture as a key concern.
The same pattern can be seen in the United States, where identity politics has overtaken civic nationalism. The idea of the American Dream—once unifying regardless of background—has given way to fragmented narratives of grievance, group loyalty, and victimhood. Multiculturalism has shifted the focus from what unites us to what divides us.
Social Tension and Political Polarization
Multiculturalism has proven to be a fertile ground for social conflict. Cultural misunderstandings, conflicting moral norms, and competition over resources have created a climate of mutual resentment. In Sweden and Germany, the influx of migrants from vastly different cultural backgrounds has overwhelmed social services and sparked clashes over everything from women’s rights to freedom of speech.
This tension spills into the political sphere, where right-wing nationalist parties have gained popularity by capitalizing on public frustration. In Austria, Italy, France, and even historically open countries like the Netherlands and Denmark, anti-immigration parties have surged in elections. Multiculturalism, meant to foster harmony, has instead intensified division and fueled a return to ethnic nationalism.
The Myth of Economic Enrichment
One of the common arguments for multiculturalism is that it leads to economic innovation and labor market dynamism. While some immigrants contribute positively, this view often ignores the financial burden of large, unassimilated populations. Welfare dependency is disproportionately high among certain immigrant groups in countries like Sweden and the UK. Language barriers, lack of integration, and cultural incompatibility make economic participation difficult, resulting in poverty and social exclusion cycles.
Moreover, employers often respond to multicultural labor markets by creating ethnically stratified job roles, further reinforcing segregation. In this way, multiculturalism can produce a kind of economic apartheid—visible diversity masking deep structural inequality.
Conclusion: A Fragmented Society, Not a Harmonious One
Multiculturalism was a noble idea—an attempt to build societies on tolerance and pluralism. But in reality, it has produced parallel societies, weakened national identities, undermined secular values, and fostered social conflict. It has demanded that host countries adapt to the cultures of newcomers rather than encouraging newcomers to embrace the civic values of their new home.
Societies must now rethink the multicultural model rather than celebrate division. Integration—not separation—should be the goal. A shared national identity, clear civic values, and a common language are essential for unity in diversity. Without them, the dream of multicultural harmony becomes a nightmare of endless fragmentation.
*****************************************************
Consciousness: The Brain’s Awareness of Itself and Its Surroundings
Consciousness is one of the most debated topics in science and philosophy. While some see it as a mystical phenomenon beyond the reach of scientific explanation, others argue that it is simply a product of brain activity. This essay supports the latter view: consciousness is nothing but the brain’s knowledge of itself and its surroundings. It emerges from neural processes and ceases to exist once the brain stops functioning, like under deep anesthesia.
Defining Consciousness
At its core, consciousness can be understood as being aware and able to experience thoughts, emotions, and perceptions. It allows individuals to recognize themselves, interact with the world, and process information. While various definitions exist, they often revolve around self-awareness and the ability to perceive external stimuli.
From a neuroscientific perspective, consciousness is widely believed to arise from complex interactions among neurons in the brain. The Global Workspace Theory (GWT) and Integrated Information Theory (IIT) suggest that consciousness emerges from large-scale neural networks integrating sensory inputs and cognitive functions. These theories reinforce the idea that consciousness is a process rather than a mystical entity.
The Role of the Brain in Consciousness
The brain plays a central role in generating consciousness. Neuroscience evidence shows that damage to specific brain regions can disrupt self-awareness and perception. For example, injuries to the prefrontal cortex or thalamus can lead to disorders of consciousness, such as coma or vegetative states. Moreover, neuroscientists have observed that electrical activity in the brain significantly decreases under anesthesia, leading to a temporary loss of consciousness.
These observations suggest that consciousness is a function of brain activity rather than an independent entity. When neural connections are active and integrated, a person experiences awareness. When those connections are disrupted—by anesthesia, trauma, or death—consciousness fades, much like turning off a light switch.
The Cessation of Consciousness After Death
If consciousness is simply the brain’s awareness of itself and its environment, then consciousness cannot exist without a functioning brain. This idea aligns with what is observed in medical conditions where brain activity ceases. People under anesthesia report experiencing “nothingness”—no sensations, thoughts, or awareness. Similarly, patients with severe brain damage who lose cognitive function do not exhibit signs of self-awareness or perception.
Upon death, the brain stops functioning entirely. Without electrical activity, there is no mechanism to generate awareness and, thus, no consciousness. This perspective challenges religious and metaphysical beliefs that consciousness persists beyond death but aligns with the scientific understanding of brain function.
Consciousness is not an independent force or an eternal entity but a biological process rooted in the brain’s ability to perceive itself and the external world. When the brain functions, consciousness exists; when it stops, consciousness ceases. Just as a person under anesthesia experiences nothingness, so too does a person who has passed away. This view demystifies consciousness, placing it firmly within the domain of neuroscience rather than metaphysical speculation. By understanding consciousness as a product of the brain, we move closer to unraveling one of science’s greatest mysteries.
**********************************************************************************************************
NO COMMENT, AMERICA
The Theory of STUPIDITY: How Ignorance Controls Society | Dietrich Bonhoeffer
Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s “mass stupidity” analysis delves into society’s perilous consequences of collective ignorance and thoughtlessness. He argues that stupidity isn’t merely a lack of intelligence but a willful blindness—an unwillingness to question authority, tradition, or the status quo. When mass stupidity prevails, individuals cease to think critically, surrendering their autonomy to the dominant ideologies or leaders of the moment. This creates a dangerous environment where harmful actions are tolerated, injustice becomes normalized, and societies can be manipulated into supporting tyranny or oppression. Bonhoeffer warns that the greatest threat to civilization isn’t necessarily overt malice but rather the quiet, insidious spread of collective ignorance that allows evil to thrive unchecked. In this context, mass stupidity becomes not just an individual failing but a societal danger that demands vigilance, education, and a commitment to independent thought.
WHY DO RATIONAL PEOPLE BELIEVE THIS?
Christopher Hitchens Strongest Points Against Religion (Thought Provoking)
Who would believe in a a religion that asks followeres to “Behead all non Muslims?”
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
IMMIGRANTS ARE NEITHER MURDERERS NOR RAPISTS
Republicans need to learn that Latin Americans are neither criminals nor rapists. They are more educated and decent than Americans. A high school graduate from Latin America has a vocabulary power of 50,000 words compared to an American high school graduate’s 15,000 words; this is evident in Donald Trump’s limited vocabulary. There is no legitimate reason to belittle or underestimate Latin Americans’ intelligence, skills, decency, perseverance, or potential. This writer is a PhD linguist and an English professor.
Here’s some information about the number of foreign-born scientists in the United States:
- Percentage of STEM workforce: In 2021, foreign-born workers comprised 19% of the U.S. STEM workforce.
- Percentage of scientists and engineers with doctorates: In 2021, foreign-born workers comprised 43% of scientists and engineers with doctorate degrees.
- Percentage of medical scientists: 44% of medical scientists are foreign-born.
- Percentage of computer software developers: 42% of computer software developers are foreign-born.
- Nobel Prize winners: Foreign-born scientists have won over a third of the nation’s Nobel Prizes in STEM fields.
- Contribution to technology: Immigrants are critical to forming U.S. technology.
- Immigrants are also overrepresented among college professors, engineers, mathematicians, nurses, doctors, and dentists.
********************************************************************************
KING SOLOMON
ON AMAZON
Life is fleeting; all is meaningless.
What does a person gain from endless toil? Generations rise and fade,
yet the world remains unchanged. The sun climbs, then falls,
only to chase the horizon once more. The wind swirls, restless and wandering,
never finding a final path. Rivers pour into the sea,
yet the sea is never full— the waters return, repeating their course.
Everything wearies the soul. We see, yet never have our fill.
********************************************************************************
. Courtesy of the Getty
https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/slavery
American Corporations and the Abuse of People and Employees
IDEAS AND PLANNING BY: SABI BEBAWI – EDITED AND CONSTRUCTED BY: CHATGPT
In pursuing profit and market dominance, many American corporations have developed a reputation for exploiting consumers and employees. From underpaying workers to manipulating public policies for financial gain, corporate America has been frequently criticized for prioritizing profits over people. This essay examines how corporations exploit their employees through unfair labor practices, create economic disparities, and manipulate legal and political systems to serve their interests at the expense of the public.
Exploitation of Employees
One of the most glaring ways corporations abuse their power is through mistreating their workforce. Many large corporations pay their employees barely sufficient wages to cover basic living expenses. Despite generating billions in revenue, companies like Walmart and Amazon have been accused of paying wages so low that some of their employees must rely on government assistance programs to survive. The prevalence of wage theft, where workers are denied overtime pay or are forced to work off the clock, further exacerbates this issue.
Moreover, corporations often suppress labor unions to prevent employees from organizing for better wages and working conditions. Many large companies engage in anti-union campaigns, using intimidation tactics and misinformation to discourage workers from collectively bargaining for their rights. This resistance to unionization keeps workers in economic vulnerability and allows corporations to maintain an underpaid and overworked workforce.
Unethical Workplace Practices
In addition to financial exploitation, many corporations impose harsh and unethical workplace conditions. Amazon, for instance, has been widely criticized for its grueling warehouse conditions. Workers are subjected to intense productivity quotas, insufficient breaks, and surveillance that tracks their every movement. Reports of employees collapsing from exhaustion or urinating in bottles to meet productivity demands highlight corporations’ extreme measures to extract maximum labor from their workforce.
Another significant issue is contingent labor, where corporations increasingly rely on temporary, part-time, or contract workers to avoid providing benefits such as healthcare, paid leave, and job security. This employment model increases profits for corporations while leaving workers in precarious financial positions, unable to secure stable employment or long-term benefits.
Manipulation of Public Policies
Corporate influence extends beyond the workplace and into the political arena, where corporations manipulate legislation and regulations to serve their financial interests. Through extensive lobbying efforts and political donations, large corporations shape policies in their favor, often at the expense of workers and consumers. The deregulation of industries, corporate tax loopholes, and policies that favor big businesses over small enterprises are all examples of how corporations abuse their economic power.
The pharmaceutical industry, for instance, has used its influence to maintain high drug prices, making essential medications unaffordable for many Americans. Meanwhile, corporations in the fossil fuel industry have actively lobbied against environmental regulations, prioritizing profits over climate responsibility. These actions demonstrate how corporations wield disproportionate power over public policy, often to the detriment of the wider population.
The abusive practices of American corporations highlight the deep-seated flaws in a system that prioritizes corporate profit over human well-being. From exploiting employees with low wages and poor working conditions to influencing legislation for financial gain, these entities operate with little accountability. Addressing these abuses requires stronger labor protections, corporate regulations, and political reform to ensure that people, not just profits, are at the center of economic policies. Until meaningful changes are made, corporate America will continue to exploit workers and consumers in its relentless pursuit of wealth and power.
******************************************************************
Islam & PEACE
Often, we hear an Islamic Scholar (oxymoron) tell us that the term “Islam” means “peace.” Nothing is further from the truth than such a statement. This writer studied Law in Egypt, and studying law requires the highest understanding of Arabic.
“Peace” in Arabic is “salam,” not “Islam.” The term “Islam” means “surrender.” Just by attributing the term “surrender” to an ideology, tarnish all the ideas of the ideology and invalidate it. Hence, Islam is an invalid and fallacious ideology. No religion in the history of mankind forces others to surrender and adapt to the religion. That is why this writer does not consider Islam a religion.
Additionally, no religion calls for the evil doing for which Islam calls, condones, and encourages. For example, Q4:95 states, “Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home).” Q8:60 advises Muslims “to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of Allah and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth … Numerous scholars (oxymoron) explain Quranic phrases on violence to be only in the context of a defensive response to oppression; this is not true.
MORE EVIDENCE
Retrieved from Reddit – (February 2025)
Unless this evil ideology and all evil ideologies and manifestos like the KKK and White Supremacy are addressed openly and freely and combated with severe force, the world shall always be in turmoil.
Please read: Islam Is A Religion of Violence by Ayaan Hirsi Ali
Christopher Hitchens on God Is Not Great
*************************************************************
The Niqab: Security Concerns and Impacts on Civilization Development
The niqab, a face-covering veil worn by some Muslim women, has been a subject of debate in various societies. While it is often defended on religious and cultural grounds, critics argue that it presents challenges regarding security and societal development. This writer finds the practice primitive, abusive to women, and uncivilized.
Security Concerns
One of the primary criticisms of the niqab is the security risk it poses. In an age where identity verification is crucial for security, the niqab makes it difficult to identify individuals. This issue is particularly relevant in airports, banks, and other high-security areas where facial recognition is necessary for safety. Law enforcement agencies often require clear identification of individuals to prevent fraud, crime, or potential terrorist threats. The concealment of the face may allow criminals to evade detection and accountability, making it easier for individuals to engage in illegal activities without being recognized.
Additionally, the niqab has been exploited by individuals seeking to disguise their identity for unlawful purposes. There have been cases where criminals and extremists have used the niqab to escape detection, smuggle contraband, or even carry out violent attacks. Such instances have fueled concerns among policymakers and security officials, leading to debates about the necessity of bans or regulations on face-covering attire in public spaces.
Impact on Civilization Development
Beyond security concerns, the niqab is often criticized for its impact on civilizations’ social and cultural evolution. The foundation of a progressive society relies on open communication, social integration, and building trust among individuals. The niqab, by covering the face, can act as a barrier to these fundamental aspects of societal interaction. Facial expressions play a crucial role in human communication, and their absence can hinder effective interaction in workplaces, educational institutions, and public life.
From a gender equality perspective, some argue that the niqab reinforces the segregation of women and limits their participation in modern societal functions. Many critics believe that the practice perpetuates patriarchal norms that restrict women’s freedoms and economic opportunities. When women are expected or required to wear the niqab, it can create social isolation and hinder their ability to contribute fully to civic and professional life. This can slow down the progress of civilization by limiting the potential of half of the population.
Furthermore, the niqab can create cultural divisions within societies prioritizing openness and transparency. In multicultural nations, where integration is key to social cohesion, full-face coverings may be perceived as a refusal to participate in the shared values and norms of the broader community. This can lead to misunderstandings, discrimination, and difficulties in fostering unity among diverse populations
While the niqab is deeply significant to those who wear it for religious or cultural reasons, its implications in terms of security and civilization development cannot be ignored. The challenge lies in balancing religious freedoms with public safety and societal progress. Governments and communities must navigate these issues thoughtfully, ensuring policies address security risks and promote integration while respecting individual rights. Nevertheless, the niqab advertises that women are merely sexual objects, and that creates more disrespect for women.
When Faith Becomes Dangerous
**************************************************************************
The Misuse of the Term Islamophobia When Applied to Islamists
The term Islamophobia is widely used to describe hostility toward Islam and its followers. However, critics argue that the term is misleading because a “phobia” implies an irrational fear, and they claim that fearing Islamists—those who seek to impose a radical, often violent interpretation of Islam—is not irrational. To assess this claim, it is important to differentiate Islamists from ordinary Muslims, examine the violent Quranic verses that Islamists wholeheartedly believe in, and evaluate whether fear of Islamism is justified.
Distinguishing Islam from Islamism
Islam is a faith followed by nearly two billion people worldwide, with a wide range of interpretations. Islamism, however, is a political ideology that seeks to establish Islamic law (Sharia) as the foundation of government and society. While not all Islamists advocate violence, many extremist groups, such as Al-Qaeda, ISIS, and the Taliban, rely on specific Quranic passages to justify terrorism and authoritarian rule.
Quranic Verses Used by Islamists
Islamists often reference certain Quranic verses to justify their violent actions, interpreting them in a way that supports their extremist ideology. Some of the most commonly cited verses include:
1. Quran 9:5 (The “Sword Verse”) – “Then, when the sacred months have passed, kill the polytheists wherever you find them, capture them, besiege them, and lie in wait for them at every ambush. But if they repent, establish prayer, and give zakat, let them go their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.”
o Islamists interpret this as a command to wage war against non-Muslims, but mainstream scholars argue that it was revealed in the context of a specific conflict with the Quraysh tribe and does not represent a universal mandate for violence.
2. Quran 8:60 – “And prepare against them whatever you are able of power and of steeds of war by which you may terrify the enemy of Allah and your enemy and others besides them whom you do not know but whom Allah knows.”
o Islamists use this verse to justify acts of terror against perceived enemies. However, many Islamic scholars argue that “preparing for war” refers to deterrence rather than aggression.
3. Quran 47:4 – “So when you meet those who disbelieve [in battle], strike [their] necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either [free them] afterward or [ransom them] until the war lays down its burdens.”
o Islamists take this as an endorsement of beheading non-believers, while traditional scholars contextualize it as a battlefield directive during wartime.
4. Quran 3:151 – “We will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve for what they have associated with Allah of which He had not sent down [any] authority. And their refuge will be the Fire, and wretched is the residence of the wrongdoers.”
o Some extremists use this to justify sowing fear among non-Muslims, while mainstream interpretations see it as a warning of divine punishment rather than a call to violence.
Is Fear of Islamists Rational?
Unlike Islam as a whole, which includes a broad spectrum of beliefs, Islamism has produced groups that openly engage in violence, suppression of dissent, and totalitarian rule. Fear of such groups is not irrational, for several reasons:
1. Terrorism and Violence – Islamist groups have carried out countless terrorist attacks worldwide, targeting both Muslims and non-Muslims. Groups like ISIS and Boko Haram have committed massacres, suicide bombings, and public executions.
2. Oppression of Women and Minorities – Many Islamist regimes enforce severe restrictions on women’s rights and persecute religious minorities. The Taliban’s policies on women’s education and freedom are a prime example.
3 Global Security Threat – Radical Islamist ideologies have inspired attacks worldwide, making Islamism a security concern beyond the Middle East.
The Danger of Conflating Islamists with All Muslims
One of the biggest issues in discussions about Islamophobia is the failure to distinguish between Islamists and the broader Muslim population. Most Muslims reject violent interpretations of their faith, and many are victims of Islamist violence themselves.
While criticism of Islamist ideology is valid, generalizing all Muslims under this label fosters discrimination and alienation. Addressing the dangers of Islamism requires a nuanced approach that separates extremists from the majority of peaceful Muslim believers.
The term Islamophobia is often misused when applied to criticism of Islamism. While irrational hatred of Muslims is unjustified, fear of Islamists—who use Quranic verses to justify violence and oppression—is based on reality. However, in confronting Islamism, it is crucial to avoid painting all Muslims with the same brush. A rational approach involves recognizing the distinction between Islam as a religion and Islamism as a political movement that, in its extreme forms, poses a real threat.
EXPAND YOUR MIND
**************************************************************************************
Misunderstandings and Misapplications of Plato’s Ideas
. Idea And Content: Sabri Bebawi—-Structured By:: ChatGPT
Plato’s philosophy has been interpreted in numerous ways, leading to significant misunderstandings and misapplications.
Authoritarian Interpretations
Many rulers and political theorists have misapplied Plato’s ideas to justify authoritarian regimes. Because Plato advocated for rule by an enlightened elite rather than democracy, some have interpreted this as an endorsement of absolute rule by a select class. However, Plato’s ideal rulers were philosopher-kings, not hereditary monarchs or autocrats who act in self-interest.
EXAMPLES
1. Fascist and totalitarian regimes have used Plato’s arguments to justify elite rule, often disregarding the philosopher-king’s emphasis on wisdom and justice.
Some communist regimes have argued that a “vanguard” party, acting as the enlightened rulers, should control the state—though often this leads to corruption and oppression rather than Plato’s vision of rational governance.
2. Elitism and Technocracy
Plato’s rejection of democracy has sometimes been used to promote technocracy—the idea that only experts or intellectuals should govern. While Plato emphasized the importance of wisdom, he also believed rulers should be morally upright and concerned with justice. Modern technocracies often focus on technical expertise without considering moral and philosophical dimensions.
3. Misunderstanding the Role of the Masses
Another common misinterpretation is that Plato completely disregarded the role of common people in society. In reality, he acknowledged that every class has an essential role, but he believed governance should be entrusted to those best suited for it. His vision was not about oppressing the lower classes but ensuring that governance is conducted by those who truly understand justice.
4. Oversimplification of Democracy vs. Aristocracy
Some thinkers reduce Plato’s argument to a simple “democracy is bad, aristocracy is good” dichotomy. However, Plato’s critique was not of democracy itself but of uninformed governance. He saw democracy as dangerous when prioritizing individual desires over collective well-being but did not propose blind aristocracy as the solution. His ideal rulers were to be selected based on rigorous education and moral training, not birthright or wealth
Plato’s ideas on the contrast between people and government revolve around the notion that governance should be based on wisdom and justice rather than popularity or wealth. While his criticisms of democracy have been validated in many historical instances, his ideas have also been misused to justify authoritarianism, elitism, and technocracy. His true vision was of a government led by philosopher-kings—individuals who rule not for personal gain but for all benefit.
***********************************************************************************
The Perils of Western Egocentricity in Understanding Islamist Ideology
By: Sabri Bebawi —–Edited by: ChatGPT
Islamists Violent Protest
Western nations have long operated under the assumption that all cultures, ideologies, and belief systems function under similar moral, political, and philosophical frameworks. This egocentric perspective has led to a fundamental misjudgment in dealing with Islamist movements, which operate under a distinct ideological paradigm. The failure to grasp this difference has contributed to repeated strategic blunders and geopolitical instability. The Western belief in universal rationality, honesty, and negotiation as tools for conflict resolution has proven ineffective when dealing with groups whose ultimate objective transcends conventional political disputes. Instead of acknowledging the deeply ingrained ideological and religious motivations driving Islamist movements, Western nations continue to project their own values onto their adversaries, thus hastening their decline.
Misinterpretation of Islamist Intentions
One of the fundamental errors Western nations make is assuming that Islamist groups function within the same framework of political grievances and national interests as they do. Many Western leaders and analysts interpret conflicts in the Middle East—such as the Palestinian-Israeli dispute—through the lens of territorial disputes and human rights concerns. However, for many Islamist organizations, these conflicts are not simply about land or political representation; instead, they are perceived as part of a broader religious struggle. Groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah frequently use the Palestinian cause as a pretext to garner support, while their ultimate goal remains the establishment of an Islamic caliphate governed by Sharia law.
This misunderstanding is evident in the West’s repeated attempts to broker peace deals and diplomatic agreements with Islamist groups that have no genuine interest in political compromise. Islamist ideology dictates that their struggle will continue until Islamic rule is established, rendering negotiations futile. When Western leaders engage in peace talks, they fail to recognize that their counterparts often view such discussions as temporary measures to buy time rather than genuine efforts to find a lasting resolution.
The Use of Deception as a Tactical Strategy
Western societies, particularly those rooted in liberal democratic traditions, operate on principles of transparency, honesty, and trust in diplomatic relations. However, many Islamist movements employ deception as a strategic tool to achieve their long-term goals. The concept of taqiyya, which allows for the concealment of one’s true beliefs under certain conditions, has been used by various Islamist groups to mislead opponents and gain strategic advantages.
For instance, Iran has repeatedly engaged in negotiations with Western powers over its nuclear program while simultaneously advancing its capabilities in secret. Similarly, terrorist organizations have often signed ceasefire agreements only to regroup and launch renewed attacks when the opportunity arises. In failing to grasp the ideological justification for such tactics, Western leaders continue to fall into the same pattern of misplaced trust and diplomatic miscalculations.
The Ultimate Goal: Global Sharia Enforcement
While Western nations often view Islamist movements as isolated nationalistic struggles, many Islamists themselves perceive their mission as a divine mandate to establish Sharia law worldwide. Groups like Al-Qaeda, ISIS, and the Muslim Brotherhood have openly declared their intent to expand Islamic governance beyond the Middle East. This goal is not hidden but explicitly stated in their literature, speeches, and recruitment propaganda. Yet, Western policymakers often dismiss these declarations as rhetorical posturing rather than genuine ideological commitments.
Western nations have repeatedly underestimated their resilience and long-term strategies by ignoring these movements’ religious and ideological underpinnings. The assumption that economic development, education, or democratic governance will deter Islamist extremism ignores the fundamental reality that many adherents to this ideology do not seek integration into the modern liberal order but instead its complete replacement with an Islamic system.
The Consequences of Western Naivety
The West’s failure to accurately assess Islamist ambitions has already resulted in severe consequences. The withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021, for example, showcased the Western belief that Islamist militants could be reasoned with or integrated into a political framework. Instead, the Taliban swiftly reasserted control, reaffirming their commitment to strict Sharia law and proving that their ideological motivations were never negotiable.
Similarly, Europe’s lenient immigration policies, combined with a refusal to acknowledge the ideological component of Islamist extremism, have led to the rise of radical enclaves within major Western cities. In some areas, Sharia law is unofficially enforced, demonstrating that Islamist ambitions are not confined to distant battlefields but have real implications within Western societies themselves.
Western nations are hastening their decline by failing to recognize that Islamist movements do not operate under the same moral and political frameworks. The persistent belief that all conflicts can be resolved through diplomacy, economic development, and democratic principles ignores the reality that an uncompromising religious ideology drives many Islamists. Until Western leaders acknowledge the true nature of this struggle and adapt their strategies accordingly, they will continue to make the same mistakes—mistakes that embolden their adversaries and weaken their standing in the world. The survival of Western civilization depends on its ability to shed its egocentric assumptions and confront ideological threats with clarity and resolve.
*****************************************************
JUST AS EXPECTED, TRUMP ON HIS WAY TO DESTROYING AMERICA
By Sabri Bebawi-Editd by Chat GPT
The presidency of Donald Trump, less than a month into its tenure, had already displayed a troubling trajectory that concerned many observers. His decisions, particularly regarding federal employment and international trade, raised significant questions about his economic understanding and the potential consequences for American stability. By firing thousands of federal employees and imposing tariffs on America’s strongest allies, Trump showcased a disregard for both economic principles and the struggles of the American people.
One of the most immediate effects of Trump’s early presidency was the dismissal of thousands of federal employees. Such a move sent shockwaves through the civil service and disrupted the functioning of essential government agencies. Federal employees are crucial in maintaining governmental operations, from regulatory oversight to national security. The mass firings led to uncertainty and inefficiency, weakening institutions that rely on experienced personnel to implement policies effectively. Furthermore, these firings stripped many Americans of their livelihoods, exacerbating financial instability for thousands of families nationwide.
In addition to his federal employment cuts, Trump’s decision to impose tariffs on America’s closest allies demonstrated a fundamental misunderstanding of economic principles. Trade tariffs are often used to protect domestic industries, but when imposed recklessly, they can backfire, leading to retaliatory measures and economic downturns. The decision to levy tariffs on allied nations, including Canada and European Union members, strained diplomatic relations and disrupted trade networks that had long benefited the United States. Allies historically engaged in fair trade with the U.S. were targeted, leading to tensions that weakened international cooperation.
Beyond the diplomatic strain, these tariffs had tangible economic consequences for Americans. Industries reliant on imported materials faced increased costs, leading to higher consumer prices. Many American businesses, particularly those involved in manufacturing and agriculture, suffered from retaliatory tariffs imposed by affected nations. Farmers, who depended on exports to sustain their livelihoods, found themselves caught in the crossfire, unable to sell their products in markets that had once been accessible. Instead of strengthening the American economy, Trump’s policies disrupted it, inflicting harm on those he claimed to represent.
Trump’s early presidency highlighted a pattern of decision-making that disregarded economic logic and the well-being of American citizens. His actions, driven by political posturing rather than informed strategy, had immediate negative consequences. The combination of mass federal firings and reckless tariff impositions revealed a leader who lacked a nuanced understanding of governance and economic policy. As a result, America found itself in a precarious position, facing internal instability and strained international relationships.
While the long-term consequences of Trump’s presidency continued to unfold, the early indicators were deeply troubling. His disregard for expert advice, coupled with impulsive policymaking, set a concerning precedent. For a nation that had long prided itself on economic resilience and global leadership, these decisions marked a departure from stability and prosperity. The American people, particularly those struggling to make ends meet, bore the brunt of these policies, raising fundamental questions about the true priorities of the Trump administration.
- Edited by ChatGPT
- By Dr. Sabri Bebawi
Within each of us lies an inner child, though some choose to ignore, suppress, or bury this part of themselves. Those who do are not truly free; they are trapped in a world of repressed memories from a time they believe is long gone, yet still very much alive within them. We are all, at our core, a collection of memories and experiences, and these shape us as adults.
At times, these buried memories and experiences resurface in adulthood, becoming vivid and real, sometimes even defining our reality. For some, especially when the memories are unpleasant or related to health struggles, they linger and replay in a relentless cycle. Without invoking the idea of ‘victimhood,’ it’s true that we are all, to some extent, victims of our own pasts, minds, and thoughts. Thoughts often arise from unknown places, leaving us to wonder, “Where did that come from?”
Because of this, it’s unwise to judge others; we cannot fully understand what another person is feeling, thinking, or experiencing. Each of us interprets the world through the unique lens of our own memories and experiences, making every person unique in their perspective.
Religions have largely failed to explain our existence or who we truly are, while philosophy has endlessly grappled with these questions. Plato, for instance, was concerned with the ultimate reality and believed that our world is merely an imitation of a true, ideal world. He distrusted the physical world, teaching that our souls (if such things exist) are prisoners within our bodies.
Philosophers, especially Plato, have highlighted the internal conflicts and tensions within us, suggesting that true peace can only come when these conflicts are harmonized. But who among us can achieve that? Aristotle, on the other hand, believed that without a soul, we are incomplete. However, the author of this narrative finds no comfort in either explanation.
The protagonist of this short novel inhabits a world created by his own mind, with an antagonist that exists beyond the bounds of reality. A significant event upends his life, but no moral judgment is passed. This is merely a reflection—a deeper exploration of the human condition through fictional characters, without any intent to insult or defame any faith, religion, or belief.
The Beginning
California is undoubtedly one of the most enchanting states in the United States, and it’s where I, Andre Besson, call home. I live in a small cottage facing the majestic Pacific Ocean. Often, while reflecting and writing, I find solace in the rhythmic sound of the waves, occasionally stealing a glance at the water as it crashes against the shore.
One late winter afternoon, as the sun was setting, I noticed a shadowy figure emerging from the ocean. As the figure drew nearer, I saw a glow that revealed a charming lady. She continued her approach, and as she got closer, an unexpected sense of calmness and serenity washed over me.
Without hesitation, I rushed to my front door, opened it, and called out, asking if she needed help or if she was stranded. There was no reply, but she kept approaching until she stood at my door. After a brief pause, she entered my cottage without saying a word. Her striking figure, with her long, beautiful black hair, was completely soaked, yet her face had a glow that defied explanation. I quickly offered to get her a towel, rushing to the closet, but when I returned, she was already dry, sitting on the red couch next to my desk.
I wanted to ask how she had dried so quickly, but strangely, I found myself unable to speak. I couldn’t even offer her a drink. After a few moments of silence, she thanked me for welcoming her into my home. I humbly told her she was welcome and that I was glad to help. The atmosphere was eerily calm. I could still hear the ocean’s waves crashing against the shore, but now they had a different rhythm, almost like a symphony or meditation music.
Embarrassed by the state of my cottage—clothes strewn everywhere, papers on the floor, books and newspapers cluttering my desk—I also felt self-conscious about my own appearance. Unshaven, with messy hair, I was dressed only in a short-sleeved t-shirt and underwear, which fortunately covered half my thighs. A catheter hung from my recent prostatectomy surgery, adding to my discomfort. I apologized for the mess, but she quickly reassured me, saying it was just fine.
There was something inexplicable about her—she was beautiful, not much older than me, with a calming voice, large, captivating black eyes, a glowing face, and an indescribable presence. Despite the unusual circumstances, I wasn’t worried or afraid; instead, I felt a deep peace and a tremendous sense of comfort and tranquility. My mind raced with questions, as if I were on a journey to uncover a rare gem or even the secrets of the universe. It felt like a journey of discovery.
Suddenly, I introduced myself as Andre Besson and asked for her name. She pondered for a moment before looking at me with her piercing black eyes and calmly responding that I could refer to her as “you,” “she,” or “her.” I was taken aback by her answer, wondering who she really was. I often refer to the divine or the universe as “she” or “her,” and I mused silently on the connection.
Love and Marriage
After a brief silence, I stood up to pour myself a glass of wine and offered her one as well. She accepted with a simple nod. I couldn’t help but worry if she was underage; she looked so much younger than me. As I walked to the kitchen, my mind raced with questions about who she was and where she had come from. But I didn’t let those thoughts linger; I focused on the task at hand—opening a bottle of cabernet sauvignon and grabbing two clean crystal glasses.
When I returned, I handed her one of the glasses. These were special, crystal goblets—a gift from a friend in Rome. She took the glass with a graceful elegance, crossing her long, slender legs, and thanked me in a voice that was as melodious as it was soothing. I sat at my desk, facing her, and asked how she ended up in the ocean, whether she was lost after a boat capsized, and if so, what happened to her companions. She raised her glass as if to toast, but I noticed she didn’t take a sip. Instead, she told me that she wasn’t on a boat and had no companions. Then, with a surprising calmness, she revealed that she had been watching me all along and had decided to visit. Startled, I asked how she could have been observing me every day and if she lived nearby. She sensed my unease and gently touched my arm. A warmth spread through my body, a sensation so comforting that it felt almost divine, though I don’t believe in such things. I kept that feeling to myself and pretended nothing had happened.
Trying to steady my nerves, I asked if she was married or had children. She smiled and told me not to be nervous, then asked what the term “married” meant. Her response was swift, almost dismissive. I agreed with her, realizing that I didn’t truly know what marriage meant anymore. I had been married nine times, each ending in failure for various reasons. Marriage, in my mind, was something society and religion imposed on us, not something inherently meaningful. When I asked if she was religious, she responded firmly that she was neither married nor religious, adding that both concepts were creations of the inhabitants of this planet. She stressed that they were not commanded nor condoned by her, a statement that left me wondering what she meant by “commanded,” though I chose not to question her further.
Curious about her perspective, I asked what she thought of marriage. She compared it to a storm—something that blows through, shaking everything in its path, even stripping away the artificial masks
humans wear. Marriage, she said, is solitude, where one is laid bare, forced to recognize that they are not a fragment of their beloved, but of the universe itself and at the heart of the creator. She spoke of love as an innate force initiated by the universe, whereas marriage was a construct imposed by primitive cultures.
Her words resonated with me deeply, echoing my own thoughts on love and marriage. As I pondered this, she broke into my thoughts, saying, “Love is irreplaceable and unmatched. It is the celestial love of a mother for her child, enveloped in tenderness. Look beyond Earth; observe the universe. It may seem chaotic, but it isn’t. Every particle in the universe loves one another, working together in perfect harmony. The universe is love itself, though humans have not evolved enough to understand this. Animals do; they see what humans cannot and are at one with the multiverse.”
I was in awe of her wisdom, realizing how profound her insights were. I knew I needed to learn more from her, and about her. She smiled, brushing her hair back, and looked at me. “You are generous,” she said.
On Hate
Although it was a lot to take in and reflect on, my instincts as a journalist, lawyer, and teacher intertwined, compelling me to ask more questions. First, I realized I hadn’t offered her a drink, so I asked if she’d like a glass of wine—my favorite drink—while I walked to the kitchen. As she saw me retrieving a bottle of Cabernet Sauvignon from the wine rack, she softly replied in her angelic, melodious voice that she would join me for a glass. I, perhaps unnecessarily, explained my love for red wine and admitted, somewhat sadly, that I drank quite a lot of it. I opened the bottle, fetched two clean glasses, and poured generously—more for myself than for her. Handing her the glass, I returned to my desk and raised my own in a silent toast. She raised hers too, without a word. As I took my first sip of the divine wine, I silently wondered if my questions were boring her or, worse, making her uncomfortable.
Sitting calmly at my desk, facing her with my legs crossed, I asked why humans are capable of hate and where these feelings originate.
“Hate is the opposite of love,” she began. “People hate because they cannot give of themselves. They may give up their wealth or possessions for recognition, but they do not truly give of themselves. Humans often struggle to offer love without expecting something in return, not realizing that the act of giving love is its own reward. Sometimes, it’s a matter of self-reflection—they don’t love themselves and project that onto others. To hate is to suffer from a lack of confidence and self-worth. All beings on Earth seek love and warmth, but sadly, only a few are capable of genuinely giving love, and some of those who do are insincere. Most humans form friendships for a specific reason, whether it’s a need for companionship at the time or a desire for the wealth of those they befriend. But this isn’t love, because once those reasons disappear, so do they.”
Her words resonated deeply with me; they mirrored what I had long believed, and it was comforting to know I wasn’t alone in this understanding. Yet, her assertion that hate is a form of self-reflection disturbed me, so I interjected. “I don’t believe you can hate. You don’t hate; you simply don’t like or subscribe to certain ideologies because they don’t represent who you are.”
I made sure she knew I agreed with her, and for a moment, she stared at me with sharp, deep eyes that seemed to pierce through me, bringing an unusual sense of peace and harmony. It felt as though a heavy burden had been lifted from me, and I was floating in a state of bliss. Despite my racing thoughts, I composed myself.
Her eyes sparkled with unshed tears as she took a deep breath and confided that the state of the world often left her despondent.
“I watch in silence and sorrow,” she continued. “Politics around the world is driven by greed, self-indulgence, self-righteousness, and a relentless hunger for power. All of it is in vain. Humanity fails to learn from its mistakes and remains oblivious and unconscious. Politics breeds wars; wars create devastation. Though not intended to be so, humans are on a path to self-destruction.”
On Disappointments
I listened to her with unwavering attention. Her wisdom resonated with me in a way I had never known before. As I reflected on her words, a question formed in my mind:
“Who are you, my lady? Your words strike like lightning; with each flash, you illuminate my understanding, soothe my soul, and elevate me to a realm of divinity.”
Humbly, she responded, “I am deeply honored by your kind words.” Her modesty only added to the enigma. My thoughts raced, struggling to comprehend who this woman was. Yet, despite my uncertainty, I found solace in her presence, enchanted by her aura. Her words inspired me to seek more answers, to quench my insatiable thirst for knowledge. However, the question of her identity lingered, gnawing at my curiosity. Ignoring the tangled thoughts in my mind, I pressed on, eager to learn more.
I realized that this was a rare opportunity to delve into the mysteries of humanity and our existence on this planet. I couldn’t let it slip away. My hunger for understanding drove me to absorb all I could from her. She seemed extraordinary, one in a trillion, or perhaps more. Yet, the question of who she truly was remained unanswered, haunting my thoughts. Suddenly, I asked her about joy and sorrow. “Why do we sometimes feel joy, while at other times we are overwhelmed by disappointment? I often find myself trapped in feelings of regret.”
She responded with calm assurance, “The more disappointment fills your heart, the more it prepares you to experience bliss. When you feel joy, look within, and you will see that what once caused you sorrow is now the source of your comfort. If you delve deeply into your soul, you will discover that what you perceive as torment is, in fact, rapture and wonder. You are not alone in your wondering; many have sought answers to the same questions.” Her philosophical insight left me breathless, filled with awe.
On Consciousness
I expressed my gratitude and then asked her about consciousness, awareness, and knowledge. I confessed that despite having read many books on the subject and even writing two of my own, I still felt that my understanding was limited and insufficient. She reached out, gently rubbing my left knee, and said, “Consciousness, awareness, and knowledge reside within your heart, but the noise of your thoughts drowns them out.
True knowledge is found in the heart and requires silence to be heard. You already know the answers within you; however, never believe that you have found the ultimate truth. What you have discovered is the path to truth, a path your consciousness must continue to follow. Your self-knowledge is boundless and ceaseless, but be careful not to build walls of material things or shield yourself from what is known.
Only then will your consciousness be free to follow the path to true knowledge, and only then will you achieve awareness.”
I offered her another glass of wine, picking up the bottle and pouring some into our glasses. Conversation with her was profoundly rewarding and enriching. I had never encountered anyone like her before. Her wisdom, her knowledge, and her ability to express her innermost thoughts were utterly captivating. Two hours had passed since she entered my cottage, and time seemed to have flown by, as it often does when one is deeply engaged and intellectually stimulated. I was undeniably both intellectually and emotionally invigorated.
On Wine and Myth
There was an unseen barrier between us, one I couldn’t articulate at the time. I felt her presence, a force so powerful it seemed to resonate through every cell in my body, every atom around us. It was overwhelming; I was overwhelmed. My mind was consumed with thoughts of who she might be, but the calmness she radiated stilled my restless inquiries. I surrendered to the moment, embracing what was happening without fear or hesitation. I took a sip of my wine, letting its warmth ease me into deeper contemplation.
I raised my glass to her, and she mirrored the gesture, though she remained silent. “May I ask more questions?” I ventured, my voice tinged with nerves. She nodded in affirmation. “I find great pleasure in wine. What do you think of it?” I asked, curious. Her response was surprising: “If you were to harvest the grapes yourself from your own vineyard, you would discover that each sip of wine carries a melody, a song from the heart of the maker to yours. So, when you drink, it’s not just wine you taste; it’s the music of the soul.”
Her words lingered in my mind, and I reflected on their meaning. Wine, then, is a melody that brings peace and joy to the heart. Perhaps this is why Christians use wine as a symbol of Jesus’ blood. Why wine and not water? This thought seemed so peculiar that I asked her, “Is that why Christians use wine as the blood of Jesus?” She responded, “Remember, I told you I am neither married nor religious. I have never commanded such rituals. Man created these symbols out of a hunger for power and control. Myths arose because people struggled to express the inner truths they glimpsed. It began with cave drawings, symbolic attempts to capture what words could not. That is all I have to say on the matter.” Her voice carried both compassion and strength, and I felt no desire to stir up chaos. I let the subject rest, considering my next question.
I took another sip of wine and refilled both our glasses. There was something about her presence, the way she looked at me with those sharp, sparkling eyes, that felt surreal. I wondered if I was drunk, given how much wine I had consumed that day, but I didn’t feel intoxicated. I questioned whether I was dreaming or hallucinating, but before I could delve too deeply into those thoughts, she interrupted, “I know you’re wondering if you’re drunk, dreaming, or hallucinating. I assure you, you’re none of those things. You’re here, now, and I am as real as the ocean before you. I am real. I wish I had visited you sooner, but there is so much to do, and many others like you seek my help and answers.”
I interrupted, “Who am I? Can you tell me who I really am?” She reached out and touched my arm with her long, gentle fingers. “Son,” she began, her voice tender, “your question comes from the depths of our heart. Why do you ask who you are? Don’t you see that you are part of a vast, interconnected system? You are an integral piece of the universe, alive within its vastness, and it lives within you. Imagine yourself as a cell within the body of God. Just as cells divide, die, and regenerate within your body, so do they in the body of the multiverse, the body of God. You are a cell in this grand being.”
I interjected, “So, are you saying there is a god?” She swiftly replied, “I use words you and others can understand. There is a universe in which you live—or rather, it lives within you—and there are other universes, a multiverse, all interconnected and in harmony. Humans call this multiverse God. Those who believe in God often do not realize that they live within the heart of this vastness, and it lives within their hearts.”
On Waiting
I took another sip of my wine and refilled my glass and could help but noticing that she had not touched her glass I did not comment. Something about her presence and her looking at me with her sharp sparkling eyes felt unreal. I thought I might have gotten drunk from the wine I had been drinking most of the day, but I did not feel drunk. I thought I was dreaming or hallucinating, but suddenly she interrupted those feelings and said: “You are fine, and you are neither drunk nor are you hallucinating. I assure you that you are fine. You are in the here and now and I am as real as the ocean before your eyes. I am real. I wish I had visited you sooner, but there is so much to do and there are many inquisitive beings like you. They need my help and seek answers. I intersected and asked: “Who are we people?” She reached and touched my arm again with her long and soft fingers and said: “I see that your question comes from the depth of your heart. Why do you ask who you are? Aren’t you aware that you are an integral part of a single system described by a well-defined physical structure, generally with a common origin and even interacting with one another. You are a part of the universe within which your very being is confined. This multi-verse is alive within your soul, and you cannot be separated. Imagine yourself a cell of God’s body; just as in your own body, cells divide; cells die, and other cells are generated. Cells regenerate in animal’s bodies, so do they in the body of God. You are but a cell in the body of the multi-verse, hence, the body of God.” I interposed: “So, are you telling me that there is a god?” She swiftly replied: “I am using words you and others can understand. There is the universe in which you live, or rather it lives within you; and there are other universes referred to as ‘multi-verse. They are all interconnected and exist in harmony. Humans view this multi-verse as God. So, those who believe in a God, they do not realize that they live in the heart of God and God lives within their hearts.”
I was speechless; her words combined with her charming persona and delicate demeanour were strikingly calming. Night has fallen upon us though it felt as if she had just walked in. We must have been talking for hours, but I did not feel the time. I was somewhat worried that if I take a glimpse at my watch to see the time, she would be offended or she would want to leave. I did not want her to leave. She knew what I was thinking, and she queried: “Am I interrupting your writing? You seem anxious. Perhaps I should go.” “No, please don’t; I am enjoying our philosophical and enlightening talk. I can talk with you all night. Shall I open another bottle of wine?” I asked and enthusiastically awaited her response. She nodded her stunning face indicating agreement. I picked up another bottle of wine, opened it and came back. I poured some or a lot of wine for me. I raised my glass to salute her, and she did the same.
As she was taking a sip of her fresh glass of wine, she precipitously asked: “In addition to reading and writing, what do you do most of the day?” I explained to her how dumbfounded I was she had asked that question because I was thinking along the same line. That lady must have had access to my inner thoughts. I did not know who she was, and I felt an unnerving intuition that she was just a ‘She’ without a name. “That is exactly what I was going to discuss with you. What do I do most of the day beside reading and writing? Mm! I wait. I always wait. From the time I wake up at dawn, I wait for sunset. After sunset, I wait for the night to sleep; in my sleep, I wait for the sun rise. I get up and wait again. In between, I wait for my nurse; as you can see, I have a catheter because of a prostate surgery. I wait for my housekeeper, and I wait for my caretaker. After that, I wait for sunset. The cycle repeats itself. I am always waiting. I also wait for my pension check; I wait for my social security income, and I wait for my bills to be cleared by my bank. I am always waiting. And now, I am waiting for my return to before my birth.” I detailed.
She looked at me with passion and sorrow. Her beautiful eyes were tearing; she took a sip of her wine and exclaimed: “Let us see, now. Why do you burden yourself with so much waiting? Things will happen on their own time, and you cannot control that is which beyond your control. Don’t you think that you cannot change the things you cannot change and must accept them?” “Yes,” I replied “But I do not have the wisdom to know the difference between that I can and cannot change. Can you instruct me on how to acquire such wisdom?” She reluctantly replied: “Wisdom is within your soul; you will need to search and find it. You were born with that wisdom like all the animal kingdom. You lost it in your evolutionary process; however, you can regain it by strength and perseverance. Perhaps it is consoling to know that you are not the only human who feels so dejected. Many of the humans with whom I conversed feel the same. You are not alone, son.”
It was after midnight in California. From my windows I could see the streets calm and noiseless; there were no cars, no people. As the wind subsided, the trees were calm, serene, and still. Even the ocean was calm, and the waves made no sound. It was as though all living things had gone to sleep, except for Her and me. She turned her neck to her left to take a glimpse of the ocean outside and she said: “I must bid you farewell now. My time to depart has arrived. Now we ended another day and sunrise shall find you where sunset had left you. The time with you was transitory, but my presence shall remain with you until I return. Remember, in your search for the truth, the truth shall uncover itself to you in a silent and purer voice.”
On Loneliness
I was dreading her leaving me alone. Though I have always been alone, but never as lonely as I have been feeling lately. I often try to convince myself that being lonely while alone is much better than being lonely while surrounded by others. I had been there, too. I requested that she speaks of loneliness. “Oh!” She interposed as though she had known what I was thinking. She continued: “Loneliness is a feeling humans get when their need for rewarding social contact and relationships is not met. But loneliness is not always the same as being alone. In the multiverse you are never lonely. Like pain, the feeling of loneliness is self-chosen. You might think you are lonely, but you are surrounded by books and words of wise men and women; you are creative, and you write. You possess a great gift that is creativity; your subconscious mind and your conscious mind are in partnership; you create. That is a gift. Loneliness is but an illusion.”
Her wise words stroke me hardly; it was true what she explained, yet, I still felt lonely, but not while with her. She spoke: “Remember that you are an integral part of the multiverse, and you are part of all that which govern that multiverse, which is expanding endlessly, be aware you are part of it all. This great galactic wilderness that appears chaotic, is not. That is where chaos meets order. You are living within that order. You are never lonely. Look and marvel at the stars that are dead and born, and the planets around you; they are speaking with you, and showing you the secret; how can you be lonely? It is unimaginable that in the vastness of the universe, you are truly never alone.
On Science
“Please, stay a little longer,” I implored. “Don’t leave me now, not when I’m in this state. You’ve unlocked my imagination, and now I’m lost in confusion and wonder. I need you to speak to me of science. Is our blue planet, Earth, really five hundred million years old? Is our sun truly twelve thousand million years old? Please, enlighten me.”
She responded, “Yes, curious one, that is true. You are a part of everything, a link in the chain of evolution. Don’t waste your thoughts on who created the universe, for you will soon find yourself asking who created the creator. The answer is hidden within the multiverse itself, and there will come a time when you’ll know. But for now, it’s too early to go beyond your origins. The truth will be revealed to you when the time is right.”
I realized she was right; every culture has its own creation myths, but they belong to the realms of mythology, religion, or folklore, all subject to interpretation. So, I asked her if God is the sum of the laws that govern the multiverse. She smiled and replied, “Your inquisitive mind is on the right path.” That was all she said.
On Aging
I wanted her to stay longer, much longer, so I asked about aging—the process, the reasons, and why it happens. This question had haunted me; I was aging, and I wasn’t handling it well. My spirit felt youthful, but my body stubbornly refused to cooperate. I hoped her wisdom could help me find some peace.
“I understand,” she said, then continued, “When humans are young, they see the elderly and feel a mix of fear, revulsion, and denial. They don’t realize that they too are aging and will one day be just as old. This is the natural order; all things must age and die, even the stars in the sky fade away. Humans need to accept this truth. As they embrace life’s journey, they must also embrace its end, for it is the journey that matters.”
I thought to myself, I can embrace the journey, but aging? Aging had made me weak, unable to do the
things I once loved.
I shared these thoughts with her, hoping she could guide me through my concerns. With aging came diseases whose names I couldn’t pronounce, and a deepening sense of isolation—yes, loneliness, though she had spoken to that already. I had reached a point where I no longer recognized myself. The mirror reflected a stranger, someone my soul didn’t know. It was overwhelming; I constantly asked myself, who am I?
She comforted me, saying, “You see yourself differently than you did when you were younger. But you are the same being. Time, which is just a concept, has passed, and you mistakenly believe you’ve changed. No, you haven’t changed; you are still you, and you will remain yourself until the time comes to journey back to the place before your birth. Only then will you understand the secrets of the multiverse and the true reasons for your journey.”
On Socialization
I wanted her to stay longer, much longer, so I asked another question—this time about socialization and relationships. It seems to me that socialization has become shallow, lacking purpose and significance. With modern technology—mobile phones, the Internet, and artificial intelligence—humans have turned into machines, not so different from the devices they use to communicate. Perhaps millions of others are lonelier than I am.
She responded, saying:
“One speaks when one is not at peace with one’s own thoughts. Conversing or reasoning with others happens when one can no longer bear the solitude of one’s heart, so words become a substitute. In this process, the ability to reflect and ponder quietly suffocates. Many people seek conversation and cling to others out of a deep-seated fear of being alone.”